Scoreability
Through Week 4 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Scoreability Index. The Scoreability Index measures the team-wide ability to each team to turn yards into points. It is not merely an offensive indicator! It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of defense and special teams, field position, red zone offense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of offense, and offensive efficiency, look at the offensive unit in a vacuum. We do not care how a unit plays in a fantasy-football vacuum because in real football games teams do not play in a vacuum. The scoreboard does not care how teams score, only that they do.Scoreability = Offensive Yards/Total Points Scored = Yards Per Point Scored (YPPS). The lower the number, the more efficiently a team scores points.
| Rank | Scoreability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | SCOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 ↑ 11 | 6 | New England | 1753 | 134 | 13.08 |
| 27 ∼ | 27 | Miami | 1588 | 86 | 18.47 |
| 16 ↑ 5 | 16 | Minnesota | 1287 | 90 | 14.30 |
| 23 ∼ | 23 | Jacksonville | 1017 | 62 | 16.40 |
| 29 ∼ | 29 | Kansas City | 1674 | 88 | 19.02 |
| 2 ↑ 7 | 2 | Houston | 1481 | 126 | 11.75 |
| 26 ↑ 2 | 26 | Indianapolis | 1071 | 61 | 17.56 |
| 24 ↓ 4 | 24 | Detroit | 1649 | 100 | 16.49 |
| 21 ↑ 4 | 21 | Green Bay | 1334 | 85 | 15.69 |
| 19 ↓ 8 | 19 | N.Y. Giants | 1644 | 111 | 14.81 |
| 18 ↓ 5 | 18 | New Orleans | 1606 | 110 | 14.60 |
| 15 ↓ 10 | 15 | N.Y. Jets | 1136 | 81 | 14.02 |
| 30 ↓ 4 | 30 | Oakland | 1275 | 67 | 19.03 |
| 32 ∼ | 32 | Philadelphia | 1671 | 66 | 25.32 |
| 11 ↑ 1 | 11 | Pittsburgh | 1048 | 77 | 13.61 |
| 5 ↑ 16 | 5 | San Diego | 1247 | 100 | 12.47 |
| 7 ↑ 12 | 7 | San Francisco | 1387 | 104 | 13.34 |
| 22 ↓ 6 | 22 | Seattle | 1126 | 70 | 16.09 |
| 17 ↑ 1 | 17 | St. Louis | 1148 | 79 | 14.53 |
| 14 ↓ 6 | 14 | Baltimore | 1696 | 121 | 14.02 |
| 3 ↓ 2 | 3 | Atlanta | 1461 | 124 | 11.78 |
| 10 ∼ | 10 | Denver | 1548 | 114 | 13.58 |
| 4 ↓ 2 | 4 | Arizona | 1084 | 91 | 11.91 |
| 8 ↓ 4 | 8 | Tampa Bay | 1104 | 82 | 13.46 |
| 13 ↑ 1 | 13 | Cincinnati | 1557 | 112 | 13.90 |
| 1 ↑ 2 | 1 | Chicago | 1230 | 108 | 11.39 |
| 12 ↓ 6 | 12 | Washington | 1687 | 123 | 13.72 |
| 28 ↑ 2 | 28 | Carolina | 1495 | 80 | 18.69 |
| 20 ↓ 5 | 20 | Tennessee | 1258 | 81 | 15.53 |
| 9 ↓ 2 | 9 | Buffalo | 1551 | 115 | 13.49 |
| 31 ∼ | 31 | Dallas | 1456 | 65 | 22.40 |
| 25 ↓ 1 | 25 | Cleveland | 1246 | 73 | 17.07 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



