Bendability
Through Week 4 of the 2012 Regular Season
About The Bendability Index. The Bendability Index quantifies the concept of the "bend but don't break defense."The Bendability Index is not merely a defensive indicator! It is a team-wide measurement of ability to keep opponents off the scoreboard. It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of offense and special teams, field position, red zone defense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of defense, and defensive efficiency, look at the defensive unit in a vacuum and do not tell you how all units work together to keep opponents off the scoreboard.Bendability = Yards allowed/Points Allowed = Yards Per Point Allowed (YPPA). The higher the number, the more “bendable” the defense.
| Rank | Bendability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | BEND |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 ↓ 2 | 14 | New England | 1467 | 92 | 15.95 |
| 15 ↓ 6 | 15 | Miami | 1418 | 90 | 15.76 |
| 10 ↑ 4 | 10 | Minnesota | 1254 | 72 | 17.42 |
| 12 ↓ 4 | 12 | Jacksonville | 1619 | 97 | 16.69 |
| 32 ∼ | 32 | Kansas City | 1336 | 136 | 9.82 |
| 2 ↑ 2 | 2 | Houston | 1092 | 56 | 19.50 |
| 25 ↓ 2 | 25 | Indianapolis | 1088 | 83 | 13.11 |
| 31 ∼ | 31 | Detroit | 1263 | 114 | 11.08 |
| 16 ↑ 2 | 16 | Green Bay | 1257 | 81 | 15.52 |
| 9 ↑ 2 | 9 | N.Y. Giants | 1489 | 84 | 17.73 |
| 21 ↓ 2 | 21 | New Orleans | 1853 | 130 | 14.25 |
| 22 ↓ 6 | 22 | N.Y. Jets | 1483 | 109 | 13.61 |
| 24 ∼ | 24 | Oakland | 1646 | 125 | 13.17 |
| 20 ↑ 7 | 20 | Philadelphia | 1193 | 83 | 14.37 |
| 29 ↑ 1 | 29 | Pittsburgh | 874 | 75 | 11.65 |
| 8 ↓ 3 | 8 | San Diego | 1266 | 71 | 17.83 |
| 11 ↑ 4 | 11 | San Francisco | 1109 | 65 | 17.06 |
| 3 ∼ | 3 | Seattle | 1103 | 58 | 19.02 |
| 17 ↑ 4 | 17 | St. Louis | 1395 | 91 | 15.33 |
| 4 ↑ 2 | 4 | Baltimore | 1561 | 83 | 18.81 |
| 6 ↓ 4 | 6 | Atlanta | 1413 | 76 | 18.59 |
| 18 ↑ 7 | 18 | Denver | 1232 | 83 | 14.84 |
| 1 ∼ | 1 | Arizona | 1428 | 61 | 23.41 |
| 7 ∼ | 7 | Tampa Bay | 1676 | 91 | 18.42 |
| 26 ↑ 3 | 26 | Cincinnati | 1462 | 112 | 13.05 |
| 5 ↑ 5 | 5 | Chicago | 1267 | 68 | 18.63 |
| 23 ↑ 3 | 23 | Washington | 1661 | 123 | 13.50 |
| 19 ↓ 2 | 19 | Carolina | 1575 | 109 | 14.45 |
| 30 ↓ 2 | 30 | Tennessee | 1686 | 151 | 11.17 |
| 28 ↓ 6 | 28 | Buffalo | 1626 | 131 | 12.41 |
| 27 ↓ 7 | 27 | Dallas | 1110 | 88 | 12.61 |
| 13 ∼ | 13 | Cleveland | 1613 | 98 | 16.46 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



