Scoreability
Through Week 7 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Scoreability Index. The Scoreability Index measures the team-wide ability to each team to turn yards into points. It is not merely an offensive indicator! It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of defense and special teams, field position, red zone offense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of offense, and offensive efficiency, look at the offensive unit in a vacuum. We do not care how a unit plays in a fantasy-football vacuum because in real football games teams do not play in a vacuum. The scoreboard does not care how teams score, only that they do.Scoreability = Offensive Yards/Total Points Scored = Yards Per Point Scored (YPPS). The lower the number, the more efficiently a team scores points.
| Rank | Scoreability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | SCOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 ∼ | 11 | New England | 3053 | 217 | 14.07 |
| 24 ↑ 1 | 24 | Miami | 2059 | 120 | 17.16 |
| 12 ↑ 3 | 12 | Minnesota | 2350 | 167 | 14.07 |
| 21 ↑ 7 | 21 | Jacksonville | 1415 | 88 | 16.08 |
| 31 ∼ | 31 | Kansas City | 2272 | 104 | 21.85 |
| 1 ↑ 1 | 1 | Houston | 2600 | 216 | 12.04 |
| 27 ∼ | 27 | Indianapolis | 2154 | 117 | 18.41 |
| 26 ↓ 3 | 26 | Detroit | 2438 | 133 | 18.33 |
| 7 ↑ 2 | 7 | Green Bay | 2519 | 184 | 13.69 |
| 9 ↑ 1 | 9 | N.Y. Giants | 2881 | 205 | 14.05 |
| 8 ↑ 4 | 8 | New Orleans | 2468 | 176 | 14.02 |
| 6 ∼ | 6 | N.Y. Jets | 2176 | 159 | 13.69 |
| 28 ↑ 1 | 28 | Oakland | 2100 | 113 | 18.58 |
| 32 ∼ | 32 | Philadelphia | 2274 | 103 | 22.08 |
| 19 ↑ 1 | 19 | Pittsburgh | 2234 | 140 | 15.96 |
| 4 ↑ 3 | 4 | San Diego | 1981 | 148 | 13.39 |
| 20 ↓ 3 | 20 | San Francisco | 2635 | 165 | 15.97 |
| 25 ↓ 4 | 25 | Seattle | 2055 | 116 | 17.72 |
| 23 ↑ 1 | 23 | St. Louis | 2206 | 130 | 16.97 |
| 15 ↓ 2 | 15 | Baltimore | 2486 | 174 | 14.29 |
| 3 ∼ | 3 | Atlanta | 2168 | 171 | 12.68 |
| 5 ↑ 3 | 5 | Denver | 2307 | 170 | 13.57 |
| 22 ↓ 3 | 22 | Arizona | 2054 | 124 | 16.56 |
| 10 ↓ 6 | 10 | Tampa Bay | 2080 | 148 | 14.05 |
| 16 ↑ 2 | 16 | Cincinnati | 2478 | 166 | 14.93 |
| 2 ↓ 1 | 2 | Chicago | 2027 | 162 | 12.51 |
| 13 ↓ 8 | 13 | Washington | 2844 | 201 | 14.15 |
| 29 ↓ 3 | 29 | Carolina | 2013 | 106 | 18.99 |
| 17 ↑ 5 | 17 | Tennessee | 2274 | 149 | 15.26 |
| 14 ↑ 2 | 14 | Buffalo | 2443 | 171 | 14.29 |
| 30 ∼ | 30 | Dallas | 2249 | 113 | 19.90 |
| 18 ↓ 4 | 18 | Cleveland | 2268 | 147 | 15.43 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



