Scoreability
Through Week 5 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Scoreability Index. The Scoreability Index measures the team-wide ability to each team to turn yards into points. It is not merely an offensive indicator! It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of defense and special teams, field position, red zone offense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of offense, and offensive efficiency, look at the offensive unit in a vacuum. We do not care how a unit plays in a fantasy-football vacuum because in real football games teams do not play in a vacuum. The scoreboard does not care how teams score, only that they do.Scoreability = Offensive Yards/Total Points Scored = Yards Per Point Scored (YPPS). The lower the number, the more efficiently a team scores points.
| Rank | Scoreability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | SCOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 ↑ 2 | 4 | New England | 2197 | 165 | 13.32 |
| 26 ↑ 1 | 26 | Miami | 1867 | 103 | 18.13 |
| 11 ↑ 5 | 11 | Minnesota | 1720 | 120 | 14.33 |
| 28 ↓ 5 | 28 | Jacksonville | 1206 | 65 | 18.55 |
| 30 ↓ 1 | 30 | Kansas City | 2012 | 94 | 21.40 |
| 2 ∼ | 2 | Houston | 1859 | 149 | 12.48 |
| 24 ↑ 2 | 24 | Indianapolis | 1535 | 91 | 16.87 |
| 22 ↑ 2 | 22 | Detroit | 1649 | 100 | 16.49 |
| 19 ↑ 2 | 19 | Green Bay | 1690 | 112 | 15.09 |
| 8 ↑ 11 | 8 | N.Y. Giants | 2146 | 152 | 14.12 |
| 9 ↑ 9 | 9 | New Orleans | 2010 | 141 | 14.26 |
| 14 ↑ 1 | 14 | N.Y. Jets | 1422 | 98 | 14.51 |
| 29 ↑ 1 | 29 | Oakland | 1275 | 67 | 19.03 |
| 32 ∼ | 32 | Philadelphia | 1917 | 80 | 23.96 |
| 18 ↓ 7 | 18 | Pittsburgh | 1391 | 93 | 14.96 |
| 7 ↓ 2 | 7 | San Diego | 1674 | 124 | 13.50 |
| 6 ↑ 1 | 6 | San Francisco | 2008 | 149 | 13.48 |
| 23 ↓ 1 | 23 | Seattle | 1436 | 86 | 16.70 |
| 13 ↑ 4 | 13 | St. Louis | 1390 | 96 | 14.48 |
| 20 ↓ 6 | 20 | Baltimore | 1994 | 130 | 15.34 |
| 3 ∼ | 3 | Atlanta | 1882 | 148 | 12.72 |
| 12 ↓ 2 | 12 | Denver | 1942 | 135 | 14.39 |
| 15 ↓ 11 | 15 | Arizona | 1366 | 94 | 14.53 |
| 5 ↑ 3 | 5 | Tampa Bay | 1104 | 82 | 13.46 |
| 16 ↓ 3 | 16 | Cincinnati | 1855 | 125 | 14.84 |
| 1 ∼ | 1 | Chicago | 1731 | 149 | 11.62 |
| 10 ↑ 2 | 10 | Washington | 2003 | 140 | 14.31 |
| 27 ↑ 1 | 27 | Carolina | 1685 | 92 | 18.32 |
| 25 ↓ 5 | 25 | Tennessee | 1525 | 88 | 17.33 |
| 17 ↓ 8 | 17 | Buffalo | 1755 | 118 | 14.87 |
| 31 ∼ | 31 | Dallas | 1456 | 65 | 22.40 |
| 21 ↑ 4 | 21 | Cleveland | 1621 | 100 | 16.21 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



