Scoreability
Through Week 3 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Scoreability Index. The Scoreability Index measures the team-wide ability to each team to turn yards into points. It is not merely an offensive indicator! It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of defense and special teams, field position, red zone offense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of offense, and offensive efficiency, look at the offensive unit in a vacuum. We do not care how a unit plays in a fantasy-football vacuum because in real football games teams do not play in a vacuum. The scoreboard does not care how teams score, only that they do.Scoreability = Offensive Yards/Total Points Scored = Yards Per Point Scored (YPPS). The lower the number, the more efficiently a team scores points.
| Rank | Scoreability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | SCOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 ↑ 3 | 17 | New England | 1173 | 82 | 14.30 |
| 27 ↓ 1 | 27 | Miami | 1108 | 65 | 17.05 |
| 21 ↑ 2 | 21 | Minnesota | 1060 | 70 | 15.14 |
| 23 ↑ 1 | 23 | Jacksonville | 805 | 52 | 15.48 |
| 29 ↓ 1 | 29 | Kansas City | 1325 | 68 | 19.49 |
| 9 ↑ 4 | 9 | Houston | 1184 | 88 | 13.45 |
| 28 ↓ 10 | 28 | Indianapolis | 1071 | 61 | 17.56 |
| 20 ↑ 5 | 20 | Detroit | 1308 | 87 | 15.03 |
| 25 ↓ 8 | 25 | Green Bay | 913 | 57 | 16.02 |
| 11 ↑ 10 | 11 | N.Y. Giants | 1278 | 94 | 13.60 |
| 13 ↑ 3 | 13 | New Orleans | 1132 | 83 | 13.64 |
| 5 ↓ 3 | 5 | N.Y. Jets | 991 | 81 | 12.23 |
| 26 ↑ 6 | 26 | Oakland | 1038 | 61 | 17.02 |
| 32 ↓ 2 | 32 | Philadelphia | 1249 | 47 | 26.57 |
| 12 ↑ 3 | 12 | Pittsburgh | 1048 | 77 | 13.61 |
| 21 ↓ 18 | 21 | San Diego | 954 | 63 | 15.14 |
| 19 ↓ 9 | 19 | San Francisco | 1006 | 70 | 14.37 |
| 16 ↓ 2 | 16 | Seattle | 807 | 57 | 14.16 |
| 18 ↓ 6 | 18 | St. Louis | 862 | 60 | 14.37 |
| 8 ↓ 4 | 8 | Baltimore | 1258 | 98 | 12.84 |
| 1 ∼ | 1 | Atlanta | 1035 | 94 | 11.01 |
| 10 ↑ 1 | 10 | Denver | 1045 | 77 | 13.57 |
| 2 ↑ 7 | 2 | Arizona | 787 | 67 | 11.75 |
| 4 ↑ 1 | 4 | Tampa Bay | 731 | 60 | 12.18 |
| 14 ↑ 5 | 14 | Cincinnati | 1175 | 85 | 13.82 |
| 3 ↑ 3 | 3 | Chicago | 870 | 74 | 11.76 |
| 6 ↑ 2 | 6 | Washington | 1213 | 99 | 12.25 |
| 30 ↓ 3 | 30 | Carolina | 1091 | 52 | 20.98 |
| 15 ↑ 14 | 15 | Tennessee | 933 | 67 | 13.93 |
| 7 ∼ | 7 | Buffalo | 1113 | 87 | 12.79 |
| 31 ∼ | 31 | Dallas | 1026 | 47 | 21.83 |
| 24 ↓ 2 | 24 | Cleveland | 889 | 57 | 15.60 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



