Scoreability
Through Week 2 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Scoreability Index. The Scoreability Index measures the team-wide ability to each team to turn yards into points. It is not merely an offensive indicator! It takes into account a variety of factors, including proficiency of defense and special teams, field position, red zone offense, and turnover differential, and then spits it all out in an easy-to-understand number. Other measures of offense, and offensive efficiency, look at the offensive unit in a vacuum. We do not care how a unit plays in a fantasy-football vacuum because in real football games teams do not play in a vacuum. The scoreboard does not care how teams score, only that they do.Scoreability = Offensive Yards/Total Points Scored = Yards Per Point Scored (YPPS). The lower the number, the more efficiently a team scores points.
| Rank | Scoreability_R | Team | Yds | Pts | SCOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 ↓ 11 | 20 | New England | 777 | 52 | 14.94 |
| 26 ↑ 5 | 26 | Miami | 727 | 45 | 16.16 |
| 23 ↓ 5 | 23 | Minnesota | 716 | 46 | 15.57 |
| 24 ↓ 5 | 24 | Jacksonville | 472 | 30 | 15.73 |
| 28 ↓ 4 | 28 | Kansas City | 815 | 41 | 19.88 |
| 13 ↓ 5 | 13 | Houston | 748 | 57 | 13.12 |
| 18 ↑ 7 | 18 | Indianapolis | 634 | 44 | 14.41 |
| 25 ↓ 3 | 25 | Detroit | 725 | 46 | 15.76 |
| 17 ↓ 1 | 17 | Green Bay | 645 | 45 | 14.33 |
| 21 ↓ 1 | 21 | N.Y. Giants | 873 | 58 | 15.05 |
| 16 ↓ 9 | 16 | New Orleans | 844 | 59 | 14.31 |
| 2 ↓ 1 | 2 | N.Y. Jets | 603 | 58 | 10.40 |
| 32 ↓ 4 | 32 | Oakland | 717 | 27 | 26.56 |
| 30 ∼ | 30 | Philadelphia | 942 | 41 | 22.98 |
| 15 ↑ 2 | 15 | Pittsburgh | 615 | 46 | 13.37 |
| 3 ↑ 8 | 3 | San Diego | 674 | 60 | 11.23 |
| 10 ↑ 2 | 10 | San Francisco | 726 | 57 | 12.74 |
| 14 ↑ 7 | 14 | Seattle | 569 | 43 | 13.23 |
| 12 ↓ 6 | 12 | St. Louis | 702 | 54 | 13.00 |
| 4 ↓ 1 | 4 | Baltimore | 755 | 67 | 11.27 |
| 1 ↑ 1 | 1 | Atlanta | 651 | 67 | 9.72 |
| 11 ↓ 6 | 11 | Denver | 670 | 52 | 12.88 |
| 9 ↑ 4 | 9 | Arizona | 495 | 40 | 12.38 |
| 5 ↑ 18 | 5 | Tampa Bay | 565 | 50 | 11.30 |
| 19 ↑ 10 | 19 | Cincinnati | 697 | 47 | 14.83 |
| 6 ↓ 2 | 6 | Chicago | 596 | 51 | 11.69 |
| 8 ↑ 2 | 8 | Washington | 832 | 68 | 12.24 |
| 27 ↑ 5 | 27 | Carolina | 764 | 45 | 16.98 |
| 29 ↓ 2 | 29 | Tennessee | 496 | 23 | 21.57 |
| 7 ↑ 8 | 7 | Buffalo | 769 | 63 | 12.21 |
| 31 ↓ 5 | 31 | Dallas | 729 | 31 | 23.52 |
| 22 ↓ 8 | 22 | Cleveland | 649 | 43 | 15.09 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



