Defensive Hog Index
Through Week 10 of the 2012 Regular Season
About the Defensive Hog Index. The Defensive Hog Index is our effort to quantify which team has the best defensive front in football. It's proven a huge indicator of success since we introduced it during the 2007 season. Teams that are better in the DHI consistently win the playoffs, especially those teams that consistently pressure the passer, as measured by Negative Pass Play%.The top defensive front is that which posts the highest average rating across the board. The Defensive Hog Index is based upon these criteria: YPA –Yards Per Attempt. So simple, even you can understand it. This rates a defense's ability to stuff an opposing ground game; NPP% – Negative Pass Plays, expressed as a percentage. This is how often an opponent's pass plays end in either a sack or interception. Defenses that get after the quarterback and overwhelm the opposing offensive line naturally force sacks and INTs. These negative pass plays are calculated as a percentage of attempts. So if a team foces two sacks and two INTs in 40 pass plays, their NPP% will be 10 percent (4/40); 3down% - Opposition success rate on third down. The lower the percentage, the higher the defensive success.
| Rank | Defensive Hog Index_R | Team | RY/A | # | NPP% | # | 3rd% | # | DHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 ↓ 3 | 14 | New England | 3.77 | 6 | 8.52 | 12 | 43.48 | 29 | 15.67 |
| 5 ↓ 3 | 5 | Miami | 3.75 | 5 | 7.96 | 15 | 34.51 | 6 | 8.67 |
| 15 ↑ 1 | 15 | Minnesota | 3.93 | 7 | 7.93 | 17 | 41.13 | 25 | 16.33 |
| 29 ↑ 2 | 29 | Jacksonville | 4.18 | 15 | 4.56 | 32 | 42.52 | 28 | 25.00 |
| 16 ↓ 2 | 16 | Kansas City | 4.43 | 27 | 8.17 | 14 | 35.58 | 9 | 16.67 |
| 2 ↓ 1 | 2 | Houston | 4.10 | 13 | 10.47 | 5 | 25.22 | 1 | 6.33 |
| 23 ↑ 3 | 23 | Indianapolis | 4.69 | 29 | 7.86 | 18 | 37.27 | 12 | 19.67 |
| 24 ↓ 6 | 24 | Detroit | 4.47 | 28 | 7.65 | 21 | 37.07 | 11 | 20.00 |
| 5 ↓ 2 | 5 | Green Bay | 4.00 | 10 | 10.05 | 9 | 34.92 | 7 | 8.67 |
| 13 ↓ 1 | 13 | N.Y. Giants | 4.41 | 26 | 11.44 | 3 | 38.33 | 17 | 15.33 |
| 26 ↓ 1 | 26 | New Orleans | 5.13 | 31 | 7.24 | 24 | 39.34 | 18 | 24.33 |
| 26 ↑ 4 | 26 | N.Y. Jets | 4.35 | 22 | 7.80 | 20 | 44.35 | 31 | 24.33 |
| 30 ↓ 2 | 30 | Oakland | 4.39 | 25 | 5.17 | 31 | 40.50 | 21 | 25.67 |
| 21 ∼ | 21 | Philadelphia | 4.21 | 18 | 6.52 | 29 | 35.09 | 8 | 18.33 |
| 16 ↑ 7 | 16 | Pittsburgh | 3.98 | 9 | 7.24 | 25 | 38.32 | 16 | 16.67 |
| 16 ↑ 2 | 16 | San Diego | 3.62 | 3 | 6.81 | 27 | 40.19 | 20 | 16.67 |
| 7 ↓ 2 | 7 | San Francisco | 3.75 | 4 | 7.01 | 26 | 33.33 | 3 | 11.00 |
| 19 ↑ 5 | 19 | Seattle | 4.34 | 21 | 9.74 | 10 | 40.63 | 22 | 17.67 |
| 11 ↓ 2 | 11 | St. Louis | 4.33 | 20 | 10.06 | 7 | 37.72 | 14 | 13.67 |
| 20 ↓ 2 | 20 | Baltimore | 3.95 | 8 | 7.41 | 23 | 40.88 | 23 | 18.00 |
| 24 ↓ 2 | 24 | Atlanta | 4.95 | 30 | 10.22 | 6 | 40.95 | 24 | 20.00 |
| 1 ↑ 7 | 1 | Denver | 3.57 | 2 | 11.29 | 4 | 36.72 | 10 | 5.33 |
| 4 ∼ | 4 | Arizona | 4.19 | 16 | 11.80 | 2 | 33.60 | 4 | 7.33 |
| 10 ↓ 3 | 10 | Tampa Bay | 3.50 | 1 | 7.85 | 19 | 39.52 | 19 | 13.00 |
| 22 ↓ 6 | 22 | Cincinnati | 4.38 | 23 | 10.06 | 7 | 41.32 | 26 | 18.67 |
| 3 ↑ 2 | 3 | Chicago | 4.20 | 17 | 12.13 | 1 | 31.62 | 2 | 6.67 |
| 26 ↑ 1 | 26 | Washington | 4.16 | 14 | 6.52 | 29 | 43.75 | 30 | 24.33 |
| 8 ↑ 1 | 8 | Carolina | 4.07 | 12 | 9.14 | 11 | 38.14 | 15 | 12.67 |
| 31 ↑ 1 | 31 | Tennessee | 4.38 | 24 | 6.67 | 28 | 42.42 | 27 | 26.33 |
| 32 ↓ 4 | 32 | Buffalo | 5.48 | 32 | 7.95 | 16 | 47.37 | 32 | 26.67 |
| 8 ↑ 5 | 8 | Dallas | 4.06 | 11 | 7.61 | 22 | 33.93 | 5 | 12.67 |
| 12 ↑ 3 | 12 | Cleveland | 4.28 | 19 | 8.38 | 13 | 37.69 | 13 | 15.00 |
Quality Stats
- Quality Stats Power Rankings
- Quality Standings
- Scoreability
- Bendability
- Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Defensive Real Passing Yards per Attempt
- Real Quarterback Rating
- Defensive Real Quarterback Rating
- Offensive Passer Rating
- Defensive Passer Rating
- Passer Rating Differential
- Offensive Hog Index
- Defensive Hog Index
- The Relativity Index
- Correlation to Victory
- Predictive Rate of Victory
Premium Articles
- Super Bowl XLVII: Baltimore-San Francisco (-4)
- Jim Harbaugh 'System' Makes San Francisco 49ers NFL's Deadliest ATS Machine
- Baltimore Ravens Reach Super Bowl Despite Roller Coaster Season, Doubting Public
- Comeback Player Of the Year Spurs CHFF To Huge Late-Season Run
- San Francisco 49ers Biggest Road Favorite In Modern Title Game History
- Baltimore at New England (-8): AFC's Best Rivals Fight For Super Bowl
- San Francisco (-4.5) at Atlanta: The 49ers Wow! Factor
- Wild Divisional Round: Real And Spectacular Picks Week In Review
- Playoff History Is Kind To Home Teams ATS
-
Houston at New England (-9.5): Rematches A Bitch For Patriots
- All Premium Articles



