Week 9 Rusher Rating: Getting deep on the ground
Cold, Hard Football Facts for Nov 08, 2011
By Ken Crippen
Cold, Hard Football Facts Running Threat
Denver’s Willis McGahee led all Week 9 rushers with a 150.27 Rusher Rating. His 20 carries for 163 yards and two touchdowns put him ahead of his next closest competitor. Houston’s Arian Foster had 19 carries for 124 yards and a touchdown to take second place with a 134.79 Rusher Rating.
Philadelphia’s LeSean McCoy still has the overall season lead with a 135.07 Rusher Rating. With Adrian Peterson on a bye, he holds steady with a 123.44 Rusher Rating, good for second place. Buffalo’s Fred Jackson slipped two spots in the season rankings, based on his worst performance of the season: 18 carries for 82 yards and a fumble for a 51.23 Rusher Rating.
San Francisco still leads the season in Rusher Rating Differential with 46.80. Baltimore is second with a 33.23 Rusher Rating Differential.
Here are the top 10 rushers of week 9 with a minimum of 15 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
Now, the top 10 rushers of the season with a minimum of 105 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
Situational Statistics
For the first time, we will look at situational statistics to determine running back efficiencies in various situations. However, we not only can evaluate the efficiency of the running back, but we can take a look at the overall running game for the team.
For this experiment, we used the top three running backs for the season (through week 8), based on Rusher Rating: McCoy, Peterson and Jackson. The results are rather interesting:
-Peterson has a perfect Rusher Rating of 158.33 in the last two minutes of the game.
-Fred Jackson is better rushing inside, between the center and left tackle. Peterson is best running farther left and McCoy is best on the left side or far outside to the right.
-Peterson’s Rusher Rating declines as the game goes on. The same goes for Jackson, but there is a steeper decline. McCoy performs best between 11 and 20 carries per game.
-All three are relatively consistent in the redzone.
Here are the numbers for all three backs through week 8 of the regular season:
LeSean McCoy (Through Week 8):
Adrian Peterson (Through Week 8):
Fred Jackson (Through Week 8):
Now, if we add the receiving component, we have the following:
McCoy and Peterson still lead the pack, but there is a noticeable shake-up throughout the rest of the top 10. Rice and Steven Jackson move up, while Wells drops to the bottom. In fact, Rice had the best differential of the top 10 running backs.
The situational statistics can also be applied with the receiving component to give a more complete picture of the true efficiency of a team’s running back in both phases of the game.
Rusher Rating Differential
Finally, here are all 32 teams ranked, based on Rusher Rating Differential, for the season:
How the Rusher Rating is Calculated
Here is how each component is calculated:
Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (TD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Percentage of Fumbles per Carry (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/Rushing Attempts)]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 (the same as the NFL Passer Rating System) yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (TD) + (F)] * (100/4.5)
How the Real Running Back Rating is Calculated
Now, we look at the Real Running Back Rating. Here are the updated equations with the receiving components:
Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (RUSHTD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Average Yards Gained per Reception (REC) = [Receiving Yards/(9*Receptions)]
Percentage of TDs per Reception (RECTD) = [(27.5*Touchdowns)/Receptions]
Percentage of Fumbles per Touch (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/(Rushes + Receptions))]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (RUSHTD) + (REC) + (RECTD) + (F)] * (100/7.5)
Cold, Hard Football Facts Running Threat
Denver’s Willis McGahee led all Week 9 rushers with a 150.27 Rusher Rating. His 20 carries for 163 yards and two touchdowns put him ahead of his next closest competitor. Houston’s Arian Foster had 19 carries for 124 yards and a touchdown to take second place with a 134.79 Rusher Rating.
Philadelphia’s LeSean McCoy still has the overall season lead with a 135.07 Rusher Rating. With Adrian Peterson on a bye, he holds steady with a 123.44 Rusher Rating, good for second place. Buffalo’s Fred Jackson slipped two spots in the season rankings, based on his worst performance of the season: 18 carries for 82 yards and a fumble for a 51.23 Rusher Rating.
San Francisco still leads the season in Rusher Rating Differential with 46.80. Baltimore is second with a 33.23 Rusher Rating Differential.
Here are the top 10 rushers of week 9 with a minimum of 15 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Willis McGahee – DEN | 20 | 163 | 8.15 | 2 | 0 | 150.27 |
| Arian Foster – HOU | 19 | 124 | 6.53 | 1 | 0 | 134.79 |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 16 | 71 | 4.44 | 1 | 0 | 129.90 |
| Brandon Jacobs – NYG | 18 | 72 | 4.00 | 1 | 0 | 123.49 |
| Marshawn Lynch – SEA | 23 | 135 | 5.87 | 1 | 0 | 123.15 |
| Mike Tolbert – SD | 19 | 83 | 4.37 | 1 | 0 | 122.95 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 19 | 71 | 3.74 | 1 | 0 | 119.48 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 18 | 43 | 2.39 | 1 | 0 | 114.65 |
| DeMarco Murray – DAL | 22 | 139 | 6.32 | 0 | 0 | 87.45 |
| Frank Gore – SF | 19 | 107 | 5.63 | 0 | 0 | 83.68 |
Now, the top 10 rushers of the season with a minimum of 105 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 151 | 825 | 5.46 | 9 | 0 | 135.07 |
| Adrian Peterson – MIN | 167 | 798 | 4.78 | 9 | 1 | 123.44 |
| Chris Wells – ARI | 123 | 526 | 4.28 | 7 | 2 | 118.43 |
| BenJarvus Green-Ellis – NE | 108 | 452 | 4.19 | 5 | 0 | 116.38 |
| Fred Jackson – BUF | 150 | 803 | 5.35 | 6 | 1 | 114.08 |
| Ahmad Bradshaw – NYG | 111 | 440 | 3.96 | 5 | 0 | 114.07 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 157 | 692 | 4.41 | 7 | 1 | 113.06 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 133 | 532 | 4.00 | 6 | 1 | 110.73 |
| Darren McFadden – OAK | 113 | 614 | 5.43 | 4 | 1 | 109.44 |
| Steven Jackson – STL | 113 | 579 | 5.12 | 4 | 1 | 107.74 |
Situational Statistics
For the first time, we will look at situational statistics to determine running back efficiencies in various situations. However, we not only can evaluate the efficiency of the running back, but we can take a look at the overall running game for the team.For this experiment, we used the top three running backs for the season (through week 8), based on Rusher Rating: McCoy, Peterson and Jackson. The results are rather interesting:
-Peterson has a perfect Rusher Rating of 158.33 in the last two minutes of the game.
-Fred Jackson is better rushing inside, between the center and left tackle. Peterson is best running farther left and McCoy is best on the left side or far outside to the right.
-Peterson’s Rusher Rating declines as the game goes on. The same goes for Jackson, but there is a steeper decline. McCoy performs best between 11 and 20 carries per game.
-All three are relatively consistent in the redzone.
Here are the numbers for all three backs through week 8 of the regular season:
LeSean McCoy (Through Week 8):
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 135 | 754 | 5.59 | 8 | 0 | 135.44 |
| Running Lane | ||||||
| Left End | 39 | 173 | 4.44 | 2 | 0 | 122.13 |
| Left Tackle | 17 | 72 | 4.24 | 1 | 0 | 127.65 |
| Left Guard | 7 | 37 | 5.29 | 1 | 0 | 134.56 |
| Center | 33 | 262 | 7.94 | 1 | 0 | 122.94 |
| Right Guard | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | 0 | 0 | 77.47 |
| Right Tackle | 8 | 65 | 8.13 | 0 | 0 | 97.36 |
| Right End | 25 | 118 | 4.72 | 3 | 0 | 131.45 |
| Attempts | ||||||
| 1 through 10 | 69 | 371 | 5.38 | 3 | 0 | 120.44 |
| 11 through 20 | 44 | 282 | 6.41 | 4 | 0 | 140.72 |
| 21 through 30 | 22 | 101 | 4.59 | 1 | 0 | 117.87 |
| Field Position | ||||||
| Own 1-20 | 18 | 89 | 4.94 | 0 | 0 | 79.91 |
| Own 21-50 | 45 | 307 | 6.82 | 0 | 0 | 90.21 |
| Opponent 49-20 | 45 | 268 | 5.96 | 1 | 0 | 104.96 |
| Redzone | 27 | 90 | 3.33 | 7 | 0 | 123.85 |
| Half | ||||||
| 1st | 71 | 337 | 4.75 | 3 | 0 | 115.91 |
| 2nd | 64 | 417 | 6.52 | 5 | 0 | 141.31 |
| Last 2 Minutes | 3 | 15 | 5.00 | 1 | 0 | 132.99 |
| Quarter | ||||||
| 1st | 36 | 189 | 5.25 | 1 | 0 | 105.97 |
| 2nd | 35 | 148 | 4.23 | 2 | 0 | 126.14 |
| 3rd | 37 | 195 | 5.27 | 3 | 0 | 134.47 |
| 4th | 27 | 222 | 8.22 | 2 | 0 | 150.67 |
| Last 7 Minutes | 11 | 64 | 5.82 | 0 | 0 | 84.70 |
| Field Type | ||||||
| Grass | 91 | 457 | 5.02 | 4 | 0 | 118.92 |
| Turf | 44 | 297 | 6.75 | 4 | 0 | 142.59 |
Adrian Peterson (Through Week 8):
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Adrian Peterson – MIN | 167 | 798 | 4.78 | 9 | 1 | 123.44 |
| Running Lane | ||||||
| Left End | 14 | 69 | 4.93 | 1 | 0 | 132.60 |
| Left Tackle | 17 | 60 | 3.53 | 1 | 0 | 123.78 |
| Left Guard | 22 | 79 | 3.59 | 0 | 0 | 72.48 |
| Center | 65 | 346 | 5.32 | 4 | 1 | 127.41 |
| Right Guard | 22 | 93 | 4.23 | 3 | 0 | 128.75 |
| Right Tackle | 14 | 108 | 7.71 | 0 | 0 | 60.98 |
| Right End | 13 | 43 | 3.31 | 0 | 0 | 70.93 |
| Attempts | ||||||
| 1 through 10 | 80 | 414 | 5.18 | 6 | 1 | 127.98 |
| 11 through 20 | 65 | 317 | 4.88 | 3 | 0 | 120.05 |
| 21 through 30 | 22 | 67 | 3.05 | 0 | 0 | 69.49 |
| Field Position | ||||||
| Own 1-20 | 38 | 174 | 4.58 | 0 | 0 | 77.90 |
| Own 21-50 | 56 | 328 | 5.86 | 0 | 1 | 76.38 |
| Opponent 49-20 | 46 | 208 | 4.52 | 1 | 0 | 96.67 |
| Redzone | 27 | 88 | 3.26 | 8 | 0 | 123.44 |
| Half | ||||||
| 1st | 87 | 459 | 5.28 | 7 | 1 | 129.01 |
| 2nd | 80 | 339 | 4.24 | 2 | 0 | 97.97 |
| Last 2 Minutes | 6 | 64 | 10.67 | 1 | 0 | 158.33 |
| Quarter | ||||||
| 1st | 52 | 260 | 5.00 | 4 | 0 | 132.99 |
| 2nd | 35 | 199 | 5.69 | 3 | 1 | 123.10 |
| 3rd | 34 | 213 | 6.26 | 2 | 0 | 138.79 |
| 4th | 46 | 126 | 2.74 | 0 | 0 | 67.81 |
| Last 7 Minutes | 24 | 76 | 3.17 | 0 | 0 | 70.15 |
| Field Type | ||||||
| Grass | 72 | 303 | 4.21 | 2 | 0 | 100.25 |
| Turf | 95 | 495 | 5.21 | 7 | 1 | 129.12 |
Fred Jackson (Through Week 8):
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Fred Jackson – BUF | 132 | 721 | 5.46 | 6 | 0 | 122.65 |
| Running Lane | ||||||
| Left End | 10 | 71 | 7.10 | 0 | 0 | 91.74 |
| Left Tackle | 16 | 73 | 4.56 | 1 | 0 | 130.59 |
| Left Guard | 23 | 119 | 5.17 | 2 | 0 | 133.94 |
| Center | 45 | 284 | 6.31 | 3 | 0 | 140.18 |
| Right Guard | 18 | 112 | 6.22 | 0 | 0 | 86.92 |
| Right Tackle | 14 | 21 | 1.50 | 0 | 0 | 61.01 |
| Right End | 6 | 41 | 6.83 | 0 | 0 | 90.27 |
| Attempts | ||||||
| 1 through 10 | 70 | 450 | 6.43 | 4 | 0 | 138.21 |
| 11 through 20 | 50 | 237 | 4.74 | 2 | 0 | 113.90 |
| 21 through 30 | 12 | 34 | 2.83 | 0 | 0 | 68.32 |
| Field Position | ||||||
| Own 1-20 | 25 | 254 | 10.16 | 1 | 0 | 140.67 |
| Own 21-50 | 39 | 166 | 4.26 | 0 | 0 | 76.13 |
| Opponent 49-20 | 47 | 253 | 5.38 | 1 | 0 | 100.99 |
| Redzone | 21 | 48 | 2.29 | 4 | 0 | 118.10 |
| Half | ||||||
| 1st | 70 | 389 | 5.56 | 3 | 0 | 120.89 |
| 2nd | 62 | 332 | 5.35 | 3 | 0 | 124.63 |
| Last 2 Minutes | 8 | 32 | 4.00 | 1 | 0 | 127.50 |
| Quarter | ||||||
| 1st | 35 | 240 | 6.86 | 2 | 0 | 140.56 |
| 2nd | 35 | 149 | 4.26 | 1 | 0 | 101.22 |
| 3rd | 36 | 271 | 7.53 | 1 | 0 | 118.47 |
| 4th | 26 | 61 | 2.53 | 2 | 0 | 118.43 |
| Last 7 Minutes | 17 | 24 | 1.41 | 2 | 0 | 113.30 |
| Field Type | ||||||
| Grass | 20 | 112 | 5.60 | 0 | 0 | 83.50 |
| Turf | 112 | 609 | 5.44 | 6 | 0 | 129.64 |
Real Running Back Rating
The missing component to the Rusher Rating System is the receiving component. With this final component, we now have a Real Running Back Rating. Looking at the season leaders through Week 8 of the NFL regular season (minimum 75 attempts) we have the following:| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 135 | 754 | 5.59 | 8 | 0 | 135.44 |
| Adrian Peterson – MIN | 167 | 798 | 4.78 | 9 | 1 | 123.44 |
| Fred Jackson – BUF | 132 | 721 | 5.46 | 6 | 0 | 122.65 |
| Chris Wells – ARI | 113 | 506 | 4.48 | 7 | 2 | 121.67 |
| BenJarvus Green-Ellis – NE | 96 | 400 | 4.17 | 5 | 0 | 121.36 |
| Steven Jackson – STL | 84 | 449 | 5.35 | 4 | 1 | 118.22 |
| Ahmad Bradshaw – NYG | 111 | 440 | 3.96 | 5 | 0 | 114.07 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 138 | 621 | 4.50 | 6 | 1 | 112.17 |
| LeGarrette Blount – TB | 77 | 328 | 4.26 | 3 | 0 | 110.35 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 115 | 489 | 4.25 | 5 | 1 | 110.12 |
Now, if we add the receiving component, we have the following:
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TD | Rusher Rating | Real RB Rating | Differential |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 23 | 138 | 2 | 135.44 | 122.04 | -13.40 |
| Adrian Peterson – MIN | 16 | 125 | 1 | 123.44 | 108.71 | -14.73 |
| Fred Jackson – BUF | 27 | 353 | 0 | 122.65 | 92.96 | -29.69 |
| Chris Wells – ARI | 4 | 12 | 0 | 121.67 | 78.58 | -43.09 |
| BenJarvus Green-Ellis – NE | 4 | 38 | 0 | 121.36 | 86.89 | -34.47 |
| Steven Jackson – STL | 16 | 83 | 1 | 118.22 | 102.08 | -16.14 |
| Ahmad Bradshaw – NYG | 24 | 210 | 1 | 114.07 | 96.68 | -17.09 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 7 | 98 | 0 | 112.17 | 88.14 | -24.03 |
| LeGarrette Blount – TB | 4 | 58 | 0 | 110.35 | 87.69 | -22.66 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 33 | 373 | 2 | 110.12 | 105.60 | -4.52 |
McCoy and Peterson still lead the pack, but there is a noticeable shake-up throughout the rest of the top 10. Rice and Steven Jackson move up, while Wells drops to the bottom. In fact, Rice had the best differential of the top 10 running backs.
The situational statistics can also be applied with the receiving component to give a more complete picture of the true efficiency of a team’s running back in both phases of the game.
Rusher Rating Differential
Finally, here are all 32 teams ranked, based on Rusher Rating Differential, for the season:| Team | Rushing Attempts | Offensive Rusher Rating | Defensive Rushing Attempts | Defensive Rusher Rating | Rusher Rating Differential |
| San Francisco 49ers | 246 | 98.11 | 163 | 51.31 | 46.80 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 209 | 98.66 | 207 | 65.43 | 33.23 |
| Minnesota Vikings | 230 | 117.23 | 198 | 93.45 | 23.78 |
| Atlanta Falcons | 223 | 109.49 | 195 | 89.26 | 20.23 |
| New England Patriots | 199 | 103.87 | 192 | 93.63 | 10.24 |
| Houston Texans | 313 | 99.19 | 201 | 89.56 | 9.63 |
| Miami Dolphins | 214 | 81.38 | 231 | 72.79 | 8.59 |
| Carolina Panthers | 214 | 115.92 | 230 | 107.73 | 8.19 |
| San Diego Chargers | 225 | 99.15 | 212 | 91.93 | 7.22 |
| New York Giants | 217 | 102.73 | 219 | 96.88 | 5.85 |
| New Orleans Saints | 240 | 107.64 | 202 | 102.99 | 4.65 |
| Green Bay Packers | 208 | 91.31 | 175 | 87.00 | 4.31 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 241 | 106.70 | 198 | 104.06 | 2.64 |
| Seattle Seahawks | 175 | 86.34 | 257 | 84.99 | 1.35 |
| Denver Broncos | 226 | 88.51 | 238 | 88.51 | 0.00 |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 224 | 86.72 | 202 | 87.75 | -1.03 |
| Tennessee Titans | 178 | 82.15 | 240 | 84.62 | -2.47 |
| Chicago Bears | 202 | 98.02 | 169 | 101.20 | -3.18 |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 186 | 94.39 | 218 | 98.49 | -4.10 |
| Washington Redskins | 186 | 90.30 | 218 | 95.05 | -4.75 |
| Buffalo Bills | 217 | 103.64 | 209 | 108.71 | -5.07 |
| Detroit Lions | 187 | 83.69 | 210 | 89.53 | -5.84 |
| Oakland Raiders | 243 | 104.54 | 215 | 111.36 | -6.82 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 232 | 93.12 | 206 | 101.25 | -8.13 |
| Arizona Cardinals | 190 | 104.34 | 242 | 114.04 | -9.70 |
| Indianapolis Colts | 201 | 89.67 | 318 | 101.32 | -11.65 |
| New York Jets | 216 | 85.74 | 232 | 99.80 | -14.06 |
| St. Louis Rams | 199 | 82.98 | 238 | 97.22 | -14.24 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 245 | 77.81 | 234 | 93.09 | -15.28 |
| Dallas Cowboys | 198 | 80.78 | 193 | 96.33 | -15.55 |
| Cleveland Browns | 211 | 60.07 | 261 | 89.85 | -29.78 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 249 | 63.23 | 221 | 94.13 | -30.90 |
How the Rusher Rating is Calculated
Here is how each component is calculated:Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (TD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Percentage of Fumbles per Carry (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/Rushing Attempts)]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 (the same as the NFL Passer Rating System) yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (TD) + (F)] * (100/4.5)
How the Real Running Back Rating is Calculated
Now, we look at the Real Running Back Rating. Here are the updated equations with the receiving components:Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (RUSHTD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Average Yards Gained per Reception (REC) = [Receiving Yards/(9*Receptions)]
Percentage of TDs per Reception (RECTD) = [(27.5*Touchdowns)/Receptions]
Percentage of Fumbles per Touch (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/(Rushes + Receptions))]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (RUSHTD) + (REC) + (RECTD) + (F)] * (100/7.5)
Read more: Adrian Peterson, Ahmad Bradshaw, Arian Foster, Arizona Cardinals, Atlanta Falcons, Baltimore Ravens, Benjarvus Green-Ellis, Brandon Jacobs, Buffalo Bills, Carolina Panthers, Chicago Bears, Chris Wells, Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns, Dallas Cowboys, Darren McFadden, DeMarco Murray, Denver Broncos, Detroit Lions, Frank Gore, fred jackson, Green Bay Packers, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, Jacksonville Jaguars, Kansas City Chiefs, legarrette blount, LeSean McCoy, Marshawn Lynch, Miami Dolphins, Michael Bush, Michael Turner, Mike Tolbert, Minnesota Vikings, New England Patriots, New Orleans Saints, New York Giants, New York Jets, NFL, Oakland Raiders, Philadelphia Eagles, Pittsburgh Steelers, Ray Rice, Real Running Back Rating, rusher rating, San Diego Chargers, San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, St. Louis Rams, Steven Jackson, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tennessee Titans, Washington Redskins, Willis McGahee
Forearm Shiver: the CHFF Blog
- Wise Guys: Broncos, Patriots, 49ers Top Expected Win Totals In 2013
- Hockey Announcer Gone Wild: You Want To Party (Maybe) With This Guy
- Best Pass Defense Ever: Ronde Barber And The 2002 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- Reese Witherspoon Arrest Video: Hot, Bothered And Handcuffed
- Sam Adams In A Can, Just In Time For Summer Drinking Season
Quick Outs
- 'Cheeseheads' Reality Show Destined To Suck
- The 5.0 Club: Best Rushing Teams in NFL History
- Sieves: The Worst Run Defenses In NFL History
- 2013 NFL Schedule: The Year Of The Denver Broncos
- Boston, Sports, Patriotism And Terror
- Monsters of the Midway: We Need The Chicago Bears More Than Ever
- The 100 Stingiest Defenses In Football History
- NFL Crown Rule: Will It Dethrone Rushing King Adrian Peterson?
- Big Tease: 2012 New England Patriots And NFL's History Of Offensive Failures
- Epic Fail: The Wide Receiver Draft Class Of 2012
Must See Videos









