Week 14 Rusher Rating: Focus on Mendenhall
Cold, Hard Football Facts for Dec 13, 2011
By Ken Crippen
Pro Football Researchers Association
Maurice Jones-Drew’s spectacular performance was only good enough for second place in this week’ Rusher Rating. Brandon Jacobs of the New York Giants led all Week 14 rushers with a 134.72 Rusher Rating. Jones-Drew had a 122.83 Rusher Rating. Shonn Greene, Marshawn Lynch and Steven Jackson round out the top five.
Here are the top 10 rushers of week 14 with a minimum of 15 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
For the season, McCoy still holds a commanding lead with a 130.13 Rusher Rating. Ray Rice is a distant second with 110.33 and Marshawn Lynch has a 105.15 Rusher Rating for third place.
Now, the top 10 rushers of the season with a minimum of 190 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
Real Running Back Rating
Looking at the season leaders (based on Rusher Rating) through Week 14 of the NFL regular season (minimum 190 attempts) we have the following (Listed by Real Running Back Rating):
McCoy again leads in Real Running Back Rating. His 45 receptions for 310 yards and three scores gives him a Real Running Back Rating of 112.73. That gives him a comfortable lead over Michael Bush, who has a Real Running Back Rating of 94.30.
Here are all 32 teams ranked, based on Rusher Rating Differential, for the season:
His 108.61 Rusher Rating would put him in the top ten running backs this season, but he falls slightly short of the minimum number of carries used for our analysis. His Real Running Back Rating also compares favorably to the top ten backs in the league. With a few more carries, we could see him on the leader board before the season ends.
Here is how he breaks down by game:
Friends of CHFF predicted that Mendenhall would have a stellar game against the Browns, due to the fact that Ray Rice chalked up a 29 carry for 204 yard performance the previous week (Rusher Rating of 121.64). However, Mendenhall only had 18 carries for 78 yards for a Rusher Rating of 75.94.
Looking at three stats in particular: Number of Attempts, half and quarter, it shows that Mendenhall declines as the game progresses. With a 116.90 Rusher Rating on the first ten carries, he drops to 95.10 on the next ten carries and bottoms out at 71.07 on carries 21 through 30. He has a 128.10 Rusher Rating in the first half, but falls to 92.36 in the second half. A 92.36 is not bad, but it is still a sharp decline from his first half numbers. When we break down the second half into quarters, his decline becomes more apparent. He has a 95.14 Rusher Rating in the third quarter, but falls to 87.48 in the fourth quarter.
Let’s look at how he performs based on margins of victory:
Finally, let’s break down Mendenhall’s rushing by down and distance:
He performs at a higher level in short to mid-range yardage situations. When there are seven or fewer yards to go for a first down, he has a Rusher Rating of 120.03. Compare that to his Rusher Rating of 79.36 when the Steelers have eight or more yards to go to get a first down. He also has a better Rusher Rating on first and second down than he does on third or fourth down.
Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (TD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Percentage of Fumbles per Carry (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/Rushing Attempts)]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 (the same as the NFL Passer Rating System) yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (TD) + (F)] * (100/4.5)
Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (RUSHTD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Average Yards Gained per Reception (REC) = [Receiving Yards/(9*Receptions)]
Percentage of TDs per Reception (RECTD) = [(27.5*Touchdowns)/Receptions]
Percentage of Fumbles per Touch (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/(Rushes + Receptions))]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (RUSHTD) + (REC) + (RECTD) + (F)] * (100/7.5)
Pro Football Researchers Association
Maurice Jones-Drew’s spectacular performance was only good enough for second place in this week’ Rusher Rating. Brandon Jacobs of the New York Giants led all Week 14 rushers with a 134.72 Rusher Rating. Jones-Drew had a 122.83 Rusher Rating. Shonn Greene, Marshawn Lynch and Steven Jackson round out the top five.
Here are the top 10 rushers of week 14 with a minimum of 15 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Brandon Jacobs – NYG | 19 | 101 | 5.32 | 2 | 0 | 134.72 |
| Maurice Jones-Drew – JAX | 27 | 85 | 3.15 | 2 | 0 | 122.83 |
| Shonn Greene – NYJ | 24 | 129 | 5.38 | 1 | 0 | 118.84 |
| Marshawn Lynch – SEA | 23 | 115 | 5.00 | 1 | 0 | 118.38 |
| Steven Jackson –STL | 20 | 63 | 3.15 | 1 | 0 | 113.95 |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 27 | 38 | 1.41 | 2 | 0 | 113.28 |
| Michael Bush – OAK | 23 | 78 | 3.39 | 1 | 0 | 109.55 |
| LeGarrette Blount – TB | 18 | 74 | 4.11 | 1 | 1 | 97.56 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 26 | 103 | 3.96 | 1 | 1 | 89.90 |
| Marion Barber – CHI | 27 | 108 | 4.00 | 1 | 1 | 89.54 |
For the season, McCoy still holds a commanding lead with a 130.13 Rusher Rating. Ray Rice is a distant second with 110.33 and Marshawn Lynch has a 105.15 Rusher Rating for third place.
Now, the top 10 rushers of the season with a minimum of 190 attempts, based on Rusher Rating:
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 242 | 1,172 | 4.84 | 14 | 0 | 130.13 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 234 | 1,029 | 4.40 | 10 | 2 | 110.33 |
| Marshawn Lynch – SEA | 225 | 969 | 4.31 | 9 | 3 | 105.15 |
| Chris Wells – ARI | 216 | 943 | 4.37 | 9 | 4 | 104.46 |
| Michael Bush – OAK | 196 | 764 | 3.90 | 7 | 1 | 103.08 |
| Arian Foster – HOU | 239 | 957 | 4.00 | 8 | 2 | 100.13 |
| Shonn Greene – NYJ | 207 | 868 | 4.19 | 6 | 1 | 98.92 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 254 | 1,068 | 4.20 | 8 | 3 | 97.85 |
| Steven Jackson – STL | 202 | 895 | 4.43 | 5 | 1 | 96.45 |
| Frank Gore – SF | 234 | 1,054 | 4.50 | 6 | 2 | 95.92 |
Real Running Back Rating
Looking at the season leaders (based on Rusher Rating) through Week 14 of the NFL regular season (minimum 190 attempts) we have the following (Listed by Real Running Back Rating):
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TD | Rusher Rating | Real RB Rating | Diff. |
| LeSean McCoy – PHI | 45 | 310 | 3 | 130.13 | 112.73 | -17.57 |
| Michael Bush – OAK | 26 | 319 | 1 | 103.08 | 94.30 | -8.78 |
| Arian Foster – HOU | 45 | 543 | 2 | 100.13 | 93.62 | -6.51 |
| Ray Rice – BAL | 62 | 593 | 2 | 110.33 | 92.71 | -17.62 |
| Marshawn Lynch – SEA | 22 | 178 | 1 | 105.15 | 92.08 | -13.07 |
| Steven Jackson – STL | 30 | 222 | 1 | 96.45 | 80.00 | -16.45 |
| Michael Turner – ATL | 11 | 128 | 0 | 97.85 | 76.09 | -21.76 |
| Shonn Greene – NYJ | 26 | 191 | 0 | 98.92 | 70.39 | -28.53 |
| Chris Wells – ARI | 8 | 34 | 0 | 104.46 | 69.16 | -35.30 |
| Frank Gore – SF | 16 | 101 | 0 | 95.92 | 67.06 | -28.86 |
McCoy again leads in Real Running Back Rating. His 45 receptions for 310 yards and three scores gives him a Real Running Back Rating of 112.73. That gives him a comfortable lead over Michael Bush, who has a Real Running Back Rating of 94.30.
Rusher Rating Differential
San Francisco has yet to allow a rushing touchdown this season. As a result, they still hold the top spot in Rusher Rating Differential with 38.14. Baltimore holds second place with 23.69. The Carolina Panthers are in third place with 22.03, due to their league-leading Offensive Rusher Rating of 125.93. The Colts, Buccaneers, Chiefs, Jaguars and Browns are the bottom five.Here are all 32 teams ranked, based on Rusher Rating Differential, for the season:
| Team | Rushing Attempts | Offensive Rusher Rating | Defensive Rushing Attempts | Defensive Rusher Rating | Rusher Rating Differential |
| San Francisco 49ers | 391 | 93.49 | 284 | 55.35 | 38.14 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 376 | 97.74 | 333 | 74.05 | 23.69 |
| Carolina Panthers | 356 | 125.93 | 372 | 103.90 | 22.03 |
| Minnesota Vikings | 365 | 110.76 | 352 | 91.69 | 19.07 |
| Houston Texans | 460 | 97.69 | 290 | 83.55 | 14.14 |
| New Orleans Saints | 335 | 110.10 | 295 | 97.87 | 12.23 |
| Miami Dolphins | 377 | 85.66 | 335 | 73.62 | 12.04 |
| Tennessee Titans | 310 | 89.59 | 369 | 78.94 | 10.65 |
| New England Patriots | 342 | 101.53 | 326 | 91.70 | 9.83 |
| San Diego Chargers | 351 | 96.68 | 387 | 88.71 | 7.97 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 372 | 107.74 | 339 | 99.84 | 7.90 |
| Chicago Bears | 358 | 95.02 | 303 | 87.54 | 7.48 |
| New York Jets | 364 | 96.81 | 366 | 90.00 | 6.81 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 351 | 95.84 | 318 | 89.60 | 6.24 |
| Seattle Seahawks | 351 | 91.19 | 371 | 87.90 | 3.29 |
| Atlanta Falcons | 366 | 94.60 | 316 | 91.70 | 2.90 |
| Denver Broncos | 433 | 84.98 | 394 | 83.77 | 1.21 |
| New York Giants | 336 | 99.26 | 354 | 98.64 | 0.62 |
| Green Bay Packers | 332 | 98.93 | 287 | 98.33 | 0.60 |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 363 | 88.20 | 351 | 93.58 | -5.38 |
| Detroit Lions | 299 | 90.64 | 347 | 96.63 | -5.99 |
| Oakland Raiders | 395 | 102.70 | 350 | 112.53 | -9.83 |
| Washington Redskins | 312 | 87.80 | 363 | 97.75 | -9.95 |
| St. Louis Rams | 324 | 80.92 | 411 | 90.88 | -9.96 |
| Arizona Cardinals | 316 | 93.60 | 378 | 103.81 | -10.21 |
| Buffalo Bills | 324 | 90.00 | 365 | 105.23 | -15.23 |
| Dallas Cowboys | 332 | 76.91 | 315 | 94.71 | -17.80 |
| Indianapolis Colts | 294 | 87.03 | 455 | 105.93 | -18.90 |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 300 | 90.52 | 392 | 109.77 | -19.25 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 388 | 74.80 | 418 | 94.69 | -19.89 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 407 | 73.52 | 353 | 97.02 | -23.50 |
| Cleveland Browns | 346 | 65.96 | 437 | 93.13 | -27.17 |
Situational Statistics
For the rest of the season, we will focus on a specific running back and their situational statistics. This week, we look at Rashard Mendenhall of the Pittsburgh Steelers.| Rusher Rating | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Overall | 187 | 710 | 3.80 | 8 | 1 | 108.61 |
| Real Running Back Rating | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TD | Rusher Rating | Real RB Rating | Diff. |
| Overall | 13 | 87 | 0 | 108.61 | 75.18 | -33.43 |
His 108.61 Rusher Rating would put him in the top ten running backs this season, but he falls slightly short of the minimum number of carries used for our analysis. His Real Running Back Rating also compares favorably to the top ten backs in the league. With a few more carries, we could see him on the leader board before the season ends.
Here is how he breaks down by game:
| Season | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| @ Baltimore Ravens | 12 | 45 | 3.75 | 0 | 1 | 33.54 |
| SeattleSeahawks | 19 | 66 | 3.47 | 1 | 0 | 118.04 |
| @ Indianapolis Colts | 18 | 37 | 2.06 | 0 | 0 | 64.06 |
| @ Houston Texans | 9 | 25 | 2.78 | 1 | 0 | 120.80 |
| JacksonvilleJaguars | 23 | 146 | 6.35 | 1 | 0 | 125.77 |
| @ Arizona Cardinals | 13 | 32 | 2.46 | 0 | 0 | 66.28 |
| New EnglandPatriots | 13 | 70 | 5.38 | 0 | 0 | 82.32 |
| BaltimoreRavens | 13 | 52 | 4.00 | 1 | 0 | 127.50 |
| @ Cincinnati Bengals | 16 | 44 | 2.75 | 2 | 0 | 120.64 |
| @ Kansas City Chiefs | 17 | 57 | 3.35 | 0 | 0 | 71.18 |
| CincinnatiBengals | 16 | 60 | 3.75 | 2 | 0 | 126.13 |
| ClevelandBrowns | 18 | 76 | 4.22 | 0 | 0 | 75.94 |
Friends of CHFF predicted that Mendenhall would have a stellar game against the Browns, due to the fact that Ray Rice chalked up a 29 carry for 204 yard performance the previous week (Rusher Rating of 121.64). However, Mendenhall only had 18 carries for 78 yards for a Rusher Rating of 75.94.
| Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating | |
| Running Lane | ||||||
| Left Sideline | 5 | -10 | -2.00 | 0 | 0 | 41.80 |
| Left Side | 28 | 111 | 3.96 | 1 | 0 | 105.88 |
| Middle | 59 | 234 | 3.97 | 0 | 1 | 66.44 |
| Right Side | 78 | 290 | 3.72 | 4 | 0 | 118.19 |
| Right Sideline | 17 | 85 | 5.00 | 3 | 0 | 132.99 |
| Attempts | ||||||
| 1 through 10 | 119 | 518 | 4.35 | 6 | 1 | 116.90 |
| 11 through 20 | 65 | 182 | 2.80 | 2 | 0 | 95.10 |
| 21 through 30 | 3 | 10 | 3.33 | 0 | 0 | 71.07 |
| Field Position | ||||||
| Own 1-20 | 36 | 157 | 4.36 | 0 | 0 | 76.71 |
| Own 21-50 | 71 | 354 | 4.99 | 0 | 1 | 73.41 |
| Opponent 49-20 | 45 | 119 | 2.64 | 0 | 0 | 67.29 |
| Redzone | 35 | 80 | 2.29 | 8 | 0 | 118.10 |
| Half | ||||||
| 1st | 85 | 367 | 4.32 | 5 | 0 | 128.10 |
| 2nd | 102 | 343 | 3.36 | 3 | 1 | 92.36 |
| Quarter | ||||||
| 1st | 54 | 191 | 3.54 | 3 | 0 | 120.95 |
| 2nd | 31 | 176 | 5.68 | 2 | 0 | 136.71 |
| 3rd | 65 | 269 | 4.14 | 2 | 1 | 95.14 |
| 4th | 37 | 74 | 2.00 | 1 | 0 | 87.48 |
Looking at three stats in particular: Number of Attempts, half and quarter, it shows that Mendenhall declines as the game progresses. With a 116.90 Rusher Rating on the first ten carries, he drops to 95.10 on the next ten carries and bottoms out at 71.07 on carries 21 through 30. He has a 128.10 Rusher Rating in the first half, but falls to 92.36 in the second half. A 92.36 is not bad, but it is still a sharp decline from his first half numbers. When we break down the second half into quarters, his decline becomes more apparent. He has a 95.14 Rusher Rating in the third quarter, but falls to 87.48 in the fourth quarter.
| Point Differential | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| When Winning | 104 | 431 | 4.14 | 2 | 0 | 92.40 |
| When Losing | 46 | 161 | 3.50 | 2 | 1 | 99.76 |
| When Tied | 37 | 118 | 3.19 | 4 | 0 | 123.05 |
| Winning by 15-21 Points | 22 | 142 | 6.45 | 0 | 0 | 88.19 |
| Winning by 1-7 Points | 67 | 248 | 3.70 | 2 | 0 | 99.29 |
| Losing by 1-7 Points | 29 | 103 | 3.55 | 0 | 0 | 72.27 |
| Losing by 15-21 Points | 14 | 51 | 3.64 | 2 | 1 | 91.42 |
Let’s look at how he performs based on margins of victory:
| Margin of Victory | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| Wins | 153 | 588 | 3.84 | 6 | 0 | 108.29 |
| Losses | 34 | 122 | 3.59 | 2 | 1 | 110.05 |
| Win by 1-7 Points | 96 | 361 | 3.76 | 5 | 0 | 119.13 |
| Win by 8-14 Points | 44 | 178 | 4.05 | 0 | 0 | 74.98 |
| Win by 15+ Points | 47 | 171 | 3.64 | 3 | 1 | 115.35 |
Finally, let’s break down Mendenhall’s rushing by down and distance:
| Down and Distance | Attempts | Yards | Yards per Attempt | TD | Fumbles | Rusher Rating |
| 1st Down | ||||||
| To Go: 1-2 Yards | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 0 | 105.56 |
| To Go: 3-7 Yards | 8 | 16 | 2.00 | 1 | 0 | 116.63 |
| To Go: 8-10 Yards | 102 | 437 | 4.28 | 1 | 1 | 80.21 |
| To Go: 11+ Yards | 4 | 12 | 3.00 | 0 | 0 | 69.24 |
| 2nd Down | ||||||
| To Go: 1-2 Yards | 9 | 40 | 4.44 | 1 | 0 | 129.94 |
| To Go: 3-7 Yards | 27 | 85 | 3.15 | 3 | 0 | 122.83 |
| To Go: 8-10 Yards | 21 | 91 | 4.33 | 0 | 0 | 76.55 |
| To Go: 11+ Yards | 3 | 17 | 5.67 | 0 | 0 | 83.87 |
| 3rd Down | ||||||
| To Go: 1-2 Yards | 4 | 12 | 3.00 | 0 | 0 | 69.24 |
| 4th Down | ||||||
| To Go: 1-2 Yards | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 52.78 |
He performs at a higher level in short to mid-range yardage situations. When there are seven or fewer yards to go for a first down, he has a Rusher Rating of 120.03. Compare that to his Rusher Rating of 79.36 when the Steelers have eight or more yards to go to get a first down. He also has a better Rusher Rating on first and second down than he does on third or fourth down.
How the Rusher Rating is Calculated
Here is how each component is calculated:Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (TD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Percentage of Fumbles per Carry (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/Rushing Attempts)]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 (the same as the NFL Passer Rating System) yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (TD) + (F)] * (100/4.5)
How the Real Running Back Rating is Calculated
Now, we look at the Real Running Back Rating. Here are the updated equations with the receiving components:Average Yards Gained per Attempt (YD) = [Total Yards/(4.05 * Rushing Attempts)]
Percentage of TDs per Carry (RUSHTD) = [(39.5*Touchdowns)/Rushing Attempts]
Average Yards Gained per Reception (REC) = [Receiving Yards/(9*Receptions)]
Percentage of TDs per Reception (RECTD) = [(27.5*Touchdowns)/Receptions]
Percentage of Fumbles per Touch (F) = [2.375-((21.5*Fumbles)/(Rushes + Receptions))]
Adding these components together and adjusting to a scale of 158.3 yields:
Rusher Rating = [(YD) + (RUSHTD) + (REC) + (RECTD) + (F)] * (100/7.5)
Ken Crippen is the executive director of the Professional Football Researchers Association, a non-profit educational organization dedicated to preserving football history.You can follow him on Twitter: @KenCrippen.
Read more: Arian Foster, Arizona Cardinals, Atlanta Falcons, Baltimore Ravens, Brandon Jacobs, Buffalo Bills, Carolina Panthers, Cedric Benson, Chicago Bears, Chris Wells, Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns, Dallas Cowboys, Denver Broncos, Detroit Lions, Frank Gore, Green Bay Packers, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, Jacksonville Jaguars, Kansas City Chiefs, legarrette blount, LeSean McCoy, Marion Barber, Marshawn Lynch, Maurice Jones-Drew, Miami Dolphins, Michael Bush, Michael Turner, Minnesota Vikings, New England Patriots, New Orleans Saints, New York Giants, New York Jets, NFL, Oakland Raiders, Philadelphia Eagles, Pittsburgh Steelers, Rashard Mendenhall, Ray Rice, Real Running Back Rating, rusher rating, Ryan Mathews, San Diego Chargers, San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, shonn greene, St. Louis Rams, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tennessee Titans, Toby Gerhart, Washington Redskins
Forearm Shiver: the CHFF Blog
- Wise Guys: Broncos, Patriots, 49ers Top Expected Win Totals In 2013
- Hockey Announcer Gone Wild: You Want To Party (Maybe) With This Guy
- Best Pass Defense Ever: Ronde Barber And The 2002 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- Reese Witherspoon Arrest Video: Hot, Bothered And Handcuffed
- Sam Adams In A Can, Just In Time For Summer Drinking Season
Quick Outs
- 'Cheeseheads' Reality Show Destined To Suck
- The 5.0 Club: Best Rushing Teams in NFL History
- Sieves: The Worst Run Defenses In NFL History
- 2013 NFL Schedule: The Year Of The Denver Broncos
- Boston, Sports, Patriotism And Terror
- Monsters of the Midway: We Need The Chicago Bears More Than Ever
- The 100 Stingiest Defenses In Football History
- NFL Crown Rule: Will It Dethrone Rushing King Adrian Peterson?
- Big Tease: 2012 New England Patriots And NFL's History Of Offensive Failures
- Epic Fail: The Wide Receiver Draft Class Of 2012
Must See Videos









