Final 2010 Passing Yards Per Attempt
Cold, Hard Football Facts for Jan 02, 2011
Become a CHFF Insider to access 2011 Quality Stats, our weekly 2011 picks and brand-new features, including weekly Quality Stats Power Rankings for all 32 NFL teams, the Correlation to Victory and Predictive Rate of Victory of each Quality Stat and for other commonly used indicators, and exclusive statistical features for CHFF Insiders only.You'll learn on CHFF Insider, for example, that teams that won the Passing YPA battle won 74% of all NFL games in 2010, including an incredible 82% from Week 8 through Week 17.
Become a CHFF Insider today!
(Passing yards per attempt is a "Quality Stat" because it has a direct correlation to winning football games. Click here to read more about this "Stat That Matters." Passing YPA also cuts through the complex clutter of the passer rating formula and gives you a number that actually means something.
NOTE: Most stat-keepers do not calculate passing YPA properly! They ignore sacks, as if these game-changing plays don't matter! If you want to know why our passing yards per attempt figures are more accurate than any others you'll find anywhere, see the information below the chart.)
PASSING YARDS PER ATTEMPT UPDATE
Data is current through the end of the 2010 season.
Final 2010 Passing Yards Per Attempt
| Team | Att. | Yards | Sacks | Yards Lost | YPA | |
| 1 | San Diego | 544 | 4,746 | 38 | 227 | 7.76 |
| 2 | New England | 507 | 4,022 | 25 | 175 | 7.23 |
| 3 | Green Bay | 541 | 4,355 | 38 | 231 | 7.12 |
| 4 | N.Y. Giants | 539 | 4,002 | 16 | 117 | 7.00 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh | 479 | 3,890 | 43 | 290 | 6.90 |
| 6 | Houston | 574 | 4,369 | 32 | 226 | 6.84 |
| 7 | Dallas | 576 | 4,208 | 32 | 169 | 6.64 |
| 8 | Indianapolis | 680 | 4,700 | 16 | 91 | 6.62 |
| 9 | Denver | 580 | 4,306 | 40 | 268 | 6.51 |
| 10 | New Orleans | 661 | 4,636 | 26 | 195 | 6.46 |
| 11 | Tampa Bay | 494 | 3,564 | 30 | 203 | 6.41 |
| 12 | Philadelphia | 561 | 4,215 | 50 | 313 | 6.39 |
| 13 | Baltimore | 491 | 3,629 | 40 | 294 | 6.28 |
| 14 | Tennessee | 474 | 3,278 | 27 | 171 | 6.2 |
| 15 | San Francisco | 500 | 3,613 | 44 | 257 | 6.17 |
| 16 | Cincinnati | 590 | 3,988 | 28 | 221 | 6.10 |
| 17 | Jacksonville | 469 | 3,356 | 37 | 289 | 6.06 |
| 18 | Washington | 605 | 4,261 | 46 | 348 | 6.01 |
| 19 | Atlanta | 577 | 3,725 | 23 | 158 | 5.95 |
| 20 | Oakland | 493 | 3,472 | 44 | 291 | 5.92 |
| 21 | Miami | 558 | 3,752 | 38 | 228 | 5.91 |
| 22 | N.Y. Jets | 525 | 3,420 | 28 | 178 | 5.86 |
| 23 | Kansas City | 475 | 3,189 | 32 | 221 | 5.85 |
| 24 | Cleveland | 478 | 3,203 | 35 | 214 | 5.83 |
| 25 | Chicago | 466 | 3,397 | 55 | 382 | 5.79 |
| 26 | Detroit | 633 | 4,001 | 27 | 191 | 5.77 |
| 27 | Seattle | 544 | 3,533 | 35 | 194 | 5.77 |
| 28 | Minnesota | 505 | 3,327 | 35 | 230 | 5.74 |
| 29 | Buffalo | 519 | 3,363 | 33 | 213 | 5.71 |
| 30 | St. Louis | 590 | 3,512 | 34 | 244 | 5.24 |
| 31 | Arizona | 561 | 3,264 | 50 | 353 | 4.76 |
|
32
|
Carolina
|
484
|
2,635
|
50
|
346
|
4.29
|
***
Here's a little look at our passing yards per attempt formula and why it's superior to others.
Only our YPA is correct
Most every team yards per attempt figure you see out there is wrong! Or, at the very least, it's not calculated properly. Go to ESPN.com, Yahoo Sports, wherever. Basically, a lot of places like that will publish a net yards figure and then, in the next column, the yards per attempt figure will be based upon gross passing yards. The math just doesn't add up, at least not when you use the published figures.
So here's what you'll find from the Cold, Hard Football Facts. We use only NET passing figures to determine yards per attempt. This is gross passing yards, minus yards lost via sacks, divided by passsing attempts. If we were merely looking at individual quarterbacks and their yards per attempt, we might (might!) be inclined to use gross passing yards, so as not to penalize the quarterback if he has a sieve of an offensive line.
Sacks count as pass attempts
Our yards per pass attempt is a "Quality Stat" – a stat that has a direct correlation to victory. So we're looking at team data. After all, it's teams that win and lose football games.
There's more to our calculations, though. Instead of just dividing the net passing yardage by pass attempts, we add in the number of sacks to the attempts column. We believe this gives a far more accurate gauge of a team's ability to pass the ball. After all, when a QB is sacked, it's because he was attempting to pass. Why shouldn't this attempt to pass count as an attempt?
For example, if a quarterback attempts 10 passes for 100 yards, his yards per attempt is 10.0 YPA. Easy enough, right? But what if that QB was sacked three times and lost 22 yards? Suddenly, the team's passing YPA is a mere 6.0 (78/13).
Hey, the team only gained 78 net yards when attempting to pass. And those 3 sacks came on attempts to pass. So, to accurately measure a team's ability to pass, that's our formula:
- Net passing yards/(pass attempts + sacks allowed)
Read more: Cold Hard Football Facts, NFL
Forearm Shiver: the CHFF Blog
- Former Bears WR David Terrell Says He'd Cut Off His Balls To Play W Jay Cutler
- Roger Goodell Defends Redskins Name In Letter To Congress
- Video: Pat Imig's FN NFL Update June 09
- Chuck Norris: 'Clutch' Tim Tebow An 'Athletic Warrior'
- Congress Wants The Redskins To Change Name - I Want Congress To Change Its Name
Quick Outs
- NFL Today: The Golden Age Of The Ground Game
- Wes Welker Excited About "Freedom" In Denver
- The 5.0 Club: Best Rushing Teams in NFL History
- Sieves: The Worst Run Defenses In NFL History
- 2013 NFL Schedule: The Year Of The Denver Broncos
- Monsters of the Midway: We Need The Chicago Bears More Than Ever
- The 100 Stingiest Defenses In Football History
- NFL Crown Rule: Will It Dethrone Rushing King Adrian Peterson?
- Big Tease: 2012 New England Patriots And NFL's History Of Offensive Failures
- Epic Fail: The Wide Receiver Draft Class Of 2012
Must See Videos









