|
Final 2005 Defensive Passer Rating
Cold, Hard Football Facts for July 11, 2006
Most "pundits" rank pass defenses by total pass yards allowed. But total pass yards allowed is a meaningless stat that has no correlation to winning football games.
Defensive passer rating is a much more effective way to rank pass defenses because it has a much more direct correlation to winning football games.
2005 defensive passer ratings (playoff teams in bold italics)
|
Team |
% |
Yards |
YPP |
TDs |
INTs |
Rating |
|
Chicago |
56.9 |
3,147 |
5.72 |
10 |
24 |
61.2 |
|
Carolina |
57.8 |
3,351 |
6.35 |
15 |
23 |
68.0 |
|
Washington |
54.4 |
3,318 |
6.20 |
15 |
16 |
70.1 |
|
Denver |
56.1 |
3,833 |
6.25 |
20 |
20 |
72.2 |
|
Cincinnati |
62.4 |
3,749 |
7.22 |
21 |
31 |
72.8 |
|
N.Y. Jets |
61.3 |
2,948 |
6.37 |
17 |
21 |
73.1 |
|
Tampa Bay |
57.8 |
3,158 |
6.63 |
15 |
17 |
73.5 |
|
Pittsburgh |
57.4 |
3,480 |
6.34 |
15 |
15 |
74.0 |
|
Dallas |
54.7 |
3,319 |
6.71 |
18 |
15 |
75.1 |
|
Minnesota |
59.8 |
3,539 |
6.64 |
23 |
24 |
75.2 |
|
N.Y. Giants |
56.7 |
3,852 |
6.64 |
20 |
17 |
76.3 |
|
Baltimore |
56.3 |
3,228 |
6.14 |
18 |
12 |
76.4 |
|
Seattle |
58.0 |
3,861 |
6.76 |
18 |
16 |
77.4 |
|
Detroit |
60.6 |
3,305 |
6.79 |
19 |
19 |
77.6 |
|
Jacksonville |
59.1 |
3,223 |
6.69 |
22 |
19 |
78.0 |
|
Cleveland |
59.2 |
3,009 |
6.39 |
19 |
15 |
78.2 |
|
Atlanta |
60.8 |
3,394 |
6.45 |
18 |
16 |
78.4 |
|
Arizona |
61.8 |
3,314 |
6.78 |
17 |
15 |
80.6 |
|
Buffalo |
62.4 |
3,560 |
7.08 |
19 |
17 |
82.1 |
|
Philadelphia |
59.0 |
3,507 |
6.97 |
24 |
17 |
82.2 |
|
Kansas City |
58.1 |
3,862 |
6.91 |
25 |
16 |
82.3 |
|
Miami |
58.8 |
3,682 |
6.71 |
23 |
14 |
82.4 |
|
Indianapolis |
67.4 |
3,469 |
6.82 |
17 |
18 |
83.0 |
|
San Diego |
59.6 |
3,888 |
6.86 |
20 |
10 |
84.7 |
|
New Orleans |
57.7 |
3,014 |
7.21 |
20 |
10 |
86.2 |
|
Green Bay |
58.6 |
2,876 |
6.69 |
22 |
10 |
87.8 |
|
New England |
56.2 |
3,929 |
7.45 |
25 |
10 |
87.8 |
|
St. Louis |
61.9 |
3,619 |
7.14 |
26 |
13 |
89.8 |
|
Oakland |
60.9 |
3,481 |
7.16 |
18 |
5 |
90.7 |
|
San Francisco |
64.9 |
4,620 |
8.02 |
28 |
16 |
94.2 |
|
Houston |
64.8 |
3,727 |
7.95 |
24 |
7 |
100.0 |
|
Tennessee |
63.0 |
3,462 |
7.37 |
33 |
9 |
100.7 |
* For the record, the official stat is “passer rating,” not “quarterback rating.” It’s an important distinction, as passer rating merely measures a player’s ability to pass – or, in our case here, a team’s ability to defend against the pass. It does not measure a player’s ability to actually play quarterback. As all Cold, Hard Football Facts readers know (yes, even you there, drinking the glass of bourbon), an ability to pass and an ability to play quarterback are not necessarily one and the same.
** The NFL subtracts sack yardage from a team’s total yardage figure when determining overall pass defense rankings. Coach Troup’s system does not subtract sack yardage by a defense. Look at it this way: Yardage lost via sack is not counted against a quarterback’s passer rating. Couch Troup does not count sack yardage in favor of the defense. You can quibble. But, at the end of the day, teams that get a lot of pressure on the QB are ultimately going to end up with superior defensive passer ratings anyway, whether this yardage is taken into account or not. Deal with it. Another shot of bourbon might help.
|