May 11 2008
Forums
CHFF Archives Power Rankings Charts & Lists
About Us Pigskin Detention Gridiron Glossary
Advertise
Email Us Pigskin & Sausage Links CHFF Store Subscribe to our RSS
AFC TEAM PAGES EAST Buffalo BillsMiami DolphinsNew England PatriotsNew York Jets SOUTH Indianapolis ColtsHouston TexansJacksonville JaguarsTennesse Titans NORTH Cincinnati BengalsCleveland BrownsBaltimore RavensPittsburgh Steelers WEST Denver BroncosKansas City ChiefsOakland RaidersSan Diego Chargers
NFC TEAM PAGES EAST Dallas Cowboys New York GiantsPhiladelphia EaglesWashington Redskins SOUTH Atlanta FalconsCarolina PanthersNew Orleans SaintsTampa Bay Buccaneers NORTH Chicago BearsDetroit LionsGreen Bay PackersMinnesota Vikings WEST Arizona CardinalsSt. Louis RamsSan Francisco 49ersSeattle Seahawks
Home >> Archive
Email  |  Print

The case for drafting wide receivers
Cold, Hard Football Facts for April 24, 2008

Our boy-wonder intern challenges the wisdom of the pigskin oracle called the Cold, Hard Football Facts. Looks like we'll cut out his ration of gruel this week as punishment.
 
By Mark Sandritter
Cold, Hard Football Facts boy-wonder intern
 
Ah, the NFL Draft, a time in which dreams are made, teams are built and fans are given the excuse to sit on their couch for eight hours.
 
With that bliss, however, comes a number of misconceptions, including the common theory that most wide receivers taken in the first round turn into busts while the late rounds of the draft are full of stars waiting to happen.
 
While it’s true a number of good receivers have been plucked from late rounds in recent drafts, including seventh-rounders Donald Driver and T.J. Houshmandzadeh, the fact remains that first-round receivers as a whole are far more productive than receivers taken later.
 
Since 1997 teams have drafted a total of 328 wide receivers, with 47 taken in the first round. Those 47 first-rounders have eclipsed the 1,000-yard receiving mark a combined 42 times. Conversely, none of the 88 players drafted in the fifth or sixth rounds have surpassed 1,000 yards in a single season.
 
Even perceived first-round busts such as Koren Robinson and Rod Gardner have 1,000-yard receiving seasons on their resumes.
 
Still it goes beyond 1000 yard seasons as first round receivers are more productive across the board. Here's a look at the production of wide receivers since 1997, based upon draft round. (You can tool around with a series of spreadsheets here, including one page that lists the production of every receiver taken over this period.)
 
RECEIVERS PRODUCTION by DRAFT ROUND (1997-2007)
Rd.
Rec Avg
Yards Avg
YPC
TD Avg
Rec
Yards
TDs
Seasons
1000-Yard Seasons
Players Drafted
1
43.3
613.2
13.8
4.0
9320
131840
855
215
42
47
2
31.9
433.6
13.3
2.3
7213
97998
530
226
14
45
3
28.0
366.6
11.4
2.3
4516
59017
372
161
18
45
4
22.1
304.0
11.3
1.8
3807
52280
306
172
11
45
5
9.6
131.7
7.9
0.8
1198
16464
95
125
0
42
6
10.3
134.3
7.8
0.7
1177
15315
76
114
0
46
7
12.5
163.3
8.5
0.9
2060
26945
153
165
9
58
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As you can see, first-round receivers are more productive across the board and in most cases it's not even close. Still, the greater production shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone: first-round picks are probably the most talented and are generally given more opportunities to play. What may be a bit of a surprise is the lack of production from receivers taken after the fourth round.
 
We remember the success stories like Driver and Houshmandzadeh, but they're the rare exceptions, not the rule.
 
Driver (503 receptions, 6,977 yards, 38 TDs) and Houshmandzadeh (415 receptions, 4,878 yards, 33 TDs) are by far the most productive seventh-round receivers of the past 10-plus years, while Bobby Shaw (197 receptions, 2,784 yards, 14 TDs) and Corey Bradford (215 receptions, 3,346 yards, 25 TDs) have been the best receivers taken in the sixth and fifth rounds, respectively.
 
Of the 10 most productive receivers since 1997 eight are first day picks, including the two most productive, former first-round selections Randy Moss and Torry Holt.
 
So, sure, first-round receivers frequently go bankrupt. But if you need or want a productive receiver, you're best bet is still to take one high in the draft.

Get the CHFF e-delivered
Subscribe to RSS XML
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
BittyBrowser
Add to My AOL Convert RSS to PDF
Subscribe in Rojo Add to your phone
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader MultiRSS
R|Mail Rss fwd
Blogarithm Eskobo
gritwire Simpify!
Add to Technorati Favorites! Add to netvibes
Add this site to your Protopage
Subscribe in myEarthlink
Find us at CHFF.net | Archive | Advertise with us | Get the CHFF e-delivered! | About us | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Pigskin & Sausage Links
© Copyright 2005, Pigskin Media Inc. "The Cold, Hard Football Facts" and coldhardfootballfacts.com are trademarks of Pigskin Media Inc.
- Coldhardfootballfacts.com requires the Adobe Flash 8 player or greater -- best viewed in 1280 x 1024 resolution - POWERED BY TWCM