September 02 2010 CHFF Fantasy Football Champs
Forums
CHFF Archives Power Rankings Charts & Lists
About Us Pigskin Detention Gridiron Glossary
Advertise
Email Us Pigskin & Sausage Links CHFF Fantasy
Coming soon
Subscribe to our RSS
AFC TEAM PAGES EAST Buffalo BillsMiami DolphinsNew England PatriotsNew York Jets SOUTH Indianapolis ColtsHouston TexansJacksonville JaguarsTennesse Titans NORTH Cincinnati BengalsCleveland BrownsBaltimore RavensPittsburgh Steelers WEST Denver BroncosKansas City ChiefsOakland RaidersSan Diego Chargers
NFC TEAM PAGES EAST Dallas Cowboys New York GiantsPhiladelphia EaglesWashington Redskins SOUTH Atlanta FalconsCarolina PanthersNew Orleans SaintsTampa Bay Buccaneers NORTH Chicago BearsDetroit LionsGreen Bay PackersMinnesota Vikings WEST Arizona CardinalsSt. Louis RamsSan Francisco 49ersSeattle Seahawks
Home >> Quality Stats
Email  |  Print

Final 2005 Scoreability Index
Cold, Hard Football Facts for July 19, 2006

Here's how teams rated in the Scoreability Index in 2005. Its defensive counterpart, the Bendability Index, can be found here.
 
The Scoreability Index is obtained by dividing the number of yards generated on offense by the number of points scored, yielding Yards Per Point Scored. Teams with low YPPS numbers score more efficiently than those with high YPPS numbers.
 
The Scoreability Index is not purely an offensive yardstick. It is, instead, a great barometer of team success, of overall team strength and efficiency. It is a function of many team-wide factors, including general offensive strength, special teams proficiency, turnover differential and Red Zone offense.
 
The Scoreability Index compiles all these factors into a simple and easy-to-understand number. NFC title contender Carolina, for example, needed to churn out just 12.66 yards of offense for every point it scored in 2005. Highly inefficient New Orleans, meanwhile, needed  21.41 yards of offense for every point it scored in 2005. Clearly, Carolina was far more efficient on offense.
 
The Scoreability Index is a "Stat That Matters." It is generally a more accurate indicator of overall team strength than total offense or scoring offense.
 
2005 SCOREABILITY INDEX (playoff teams in bold italics)
Team
Yards
Points
Yards Per
Point Scored
Carolina
4950
391
12.66
Seattle
5915
452
13.09
Indianapolis
5799
439
13.21
Pittsburgh
5149
389
13.24
San Diego
5567
418
13.32
Cincinnati
5730
421
13.61
N.Y. Giants
5787
422
13.71
Jacksonville
5149
361
14.26
Denver
5766
395
14.60
Washington
5289
359
14.73
New England
5632
379
14.86
Atlanta
5225
351
14.89
San Francisco
3587
239
15.01
Minnesota
4613
306
15.08
Buffalo
4122
271
15.21
St. Louis
5571
363
15.35
Kansas City
6192
403
15.36
Houston
4053
260
15.59
Tampa Bay
4716
300
15.72
Chicago
4101
260
15.77
Dallas
5202
325
16.01
Miami
5198
318
16.35
Philadelphia
5109
310
16.48
N.Y. Jets
3970
240
16.54
Detroit
4319
254
17.00
Oakland
4951
290
17.07
Tennessee
5122
299
17.13
Green Bay
5118
298
17.17
Baltimore
4693
265
17.71
Arizona
5575
311
17.93
Cleveland
4550
232
19.61
New Orleans
5031
235
21.41
 

CHFF Fantasy Football Champs

Subscribe to RSS XML
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to My AOL BittyBrowser
Simpify! Convert RSS to PDF
Eskobo Add to your phone
Add to Technorati Favorites! Add to netvibes
Add this site to your Protopage
Find us at CHFF.net | Archive | Advertise with us | Get the CHFF e-delivered! | About us | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Pigskin & Sausage Links
© Copyright 2005, Pigskin Media Inc. "The Cold, Hard Football Facts" and coldhardfootballfacts.com are trademarks of Pigskin Media Inc.
- Coldhardfootballfacts.com requires the Adobe Flash 8 player or greater -- best viewed in 1280 x 1024 resolution - POWERED BY TWCM